Webinar 4: The obligation to pursue good faith negotiations leading to the total elimination of nuclear weapons, thirty years after the ICJ’s Advisory Opinion
It has been said that, as a result of the Court’s ambiguous response to the question of the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons, the ICJ AO “is likely to become all things to all States and fail to influence State conduct”. Yet beyond its response to the question put to it, the Court made a unanimous finding that States have an obligation to pursue and conclude negotiations in good faith “leading to nuclear disarmament in all its aspects under strict and effective international control”. How has the conduct of States, in particular nuclear-armed States, been influenced, if at all, by this part of the ICJ’s AO? How is the fulfilment of this obligation to be appraised, notably “good faith” efforts?
Speakers
- The state of play of nuclear disarmament negotiations, 30 years after the ICJ AO – Hans Kristensen, Federation of American Scientists
- Making sense of nuclear disarmament in the polycrisis age – Nick Ritchie, University of York
- Assessing fulfillment of the obligation to negotiate nuclear disarmament in good faith – John Burroughs, Lawyers Committee on Nuclear Policy (LCNP) and International Association of Lawyers Against Nuclear Arms (IALANA)
- Good faith negotiations leading to the total elimination of nuclear weapons – Professor Scott Sagan, Caroline S. G. Munro Memorial Professor of Political Science and Senior Fellow at the Freeman Spogli Institute for International Studies, Stanford University

