Why does research ethics matter?

Research ethics is about ensuring that research does no harm, respects the dignity and rights of those involved, and is conducted responsibly. This is particularly important in the social sciences and humanities, where research often involves direct interactions with individuals and communities, including vulnerable populations, and addresses sensitive issues. It requires us to anticipate risks, protect both participants and researchers, ensure informed consent and confidentiality, and remain attentive to power imbalances and potential conflicts of interest.

How does the Institute approach research ethics?

The Institute promotes a proactive approach through its Master programmes, doctoral schools, faculty mentoring and supervision, and dedicated training sessions. Its Research Ethics Guidelines provide common principles, practical guidance, and useful resources, including a checklist to help researchers identify ethical issues early on in their work. The interdisciplinary Research Ethics Committee provides formal approval when required, notably for external funding applications, and can also review projects presenting significant ethical risks. The guidelines also set out mechanisms and procedures for addressing research integrity issues and conflicts.

What are the emerging challenges?

Research ethics is evolving alongside research practices. Fieldwork in complex political and social environments raises questions about local authorisations, informed consent, vulnerable populations and researcher safety. Meanwhile, growing expectations around open science and data sharing, as well as increasingly collaborative research, create challenges concerning data access, confidentiality, authorship and responsibilities. These issues should be addressed early in the research process. The growing use of AI adds further questions around data protection, bias, transparency, and accountability.

What ultimately matters in research ethics?

Institutional ethics review is an important safeguard, helping identify risks and ensure appropriate measures are considered. However, formal approval cannot anticipate every situation researchers may encounter, particularly in the field, nor should it become an exercise in bureaucratic box-ticking. Procedures should remain proportionate to the nature and risks of the research. Ultimately, ethical research depends on the judgement and responsibility of researchers themselves, supported by appropriate training, mentoring, and supervision.