“Personae” refers to individuals that operate within an assemblage. In the case of Silvercorp, numerous personae contribute to its actions, including its team; Venezuelan government, military, and opposition personnel; US government and military personnel; Cuban intelligence; and various press corps members. Within Silvercorp we can observe what Maya Christensen calls “transitory invisibility” as personae of the military, such as Jordan Goudreau, retire from public military duty and attempt to reintegrate into private society in a way that often turns out to be merely a revolving-door remobilisation of militaristic behavior operationalisd through contractual engagements with PMCs in place of public military enlistment.
“Concrete elements” refer to any non-human objects that impact the functioning of the domain. Relevant elements include the operation’s services agreement, military hardware, Silvercorp identification documents and Twitter.
“Conditioning relations” – what Nail collectively calls the “abstract machine” – refers to relationships that exist between assemblage actors. Such relations include Silvercorp’s military training of the Venezuelan opposition; diplomatic relations between Venezuela, Colombia and the US; weapons trafficking from the US to Colombia; and Silvercorp’s external communications via various Twitter accounts. Silvercorp’s training of Venezuelan opposition troops demonstrates one set of conditioning relations between the US, Venezuela and Colombia as they have now been forced to engage in diplomatic damage control.
Mapping the assemblage that enabled Silvercorp’s operation helps us widen our lens for understanding PMC industry dynamics. In particular, this analytical tool informs us of the growing enmeshment between the public and private security sectors—two seemingly independent bodies that are more connected than is immediately apparent. This entanglement reinforces the ability of veterans like Goudreau and his men to dangerously extend de oppresso liber beyond the confines of official state-sanctioned military interventions. Curtailing this behaviour is of critical concern to global security, and therefore necessitates enforcement by the states from which these military personnel emerge.
The articles in this series are based on the independent research of Graduate Institute students. The findings and interpretations are therefore theirs.